If you’ve been told you have a disc herniation in your neck or low back, your first thought might be:

“Is this permanent?”
“Will I need surgery?”
“Can this actually heal?”

The research is more detailed than most people realize.

At Central Ohio Spine and Joint in Westerville, we frequently evaluate patients from Westerville, Worthington, Dublin, Powell, Lewis Center, New Albany, Polaris, and North Columbus who are concerned about MRI findings showing a disc bulge, protrusion, extrusion, or sequestration.

The good news?
Many disc herniations improve, and many actually shrink over time. Disc herniation reabsorption is more likely than you think. 

Let’s break down what that means and how it should guide your treatment decisions.

What Is Disc Herniation Reabsorption?

Disc herniation reabsorption refers to the body’s natural ability to break down and resorb displaced disc material over time. This process occurs through inflammatory-mediated phagocytosis and vascular ingrowth into the herniated fragment.

MRI showing lumbar disc herniation with discussion of natural reabsorption and conservative care options

Overall Reabsorption Rates

Research shows that disc herniation reabsorption occurs in approximately 66–67% of cases overall.
(References 1–3)

However, the likelihood of resorption depends heavily on the type of herniation.

Reabsorption Rates by Herniation Type

  • Sequestration: 93–96% reabsorption

  • Extrusion: ~70%

  • Protrusion: 41–52%

  • Bulging: ~13%

(References 1–3)

Larger herniations, transligamentous herniations, and higher Komori types are also predictors of spontaneous regression. (Reference 1)

Interestingly, the more dramatic-looking herniations on MRI — like sequestrations — are actually more likely to resorb than mild bulges.

This is one reason why imaging alone should not drive treatment decisions.

How Long Does Disc Reabsorption Take?

The mean time to radiographic resorption is approximately 8–12 months.
(References 4–5)

However:

  • About 25% of patients show early resorption within 3 months

  • Complete resolution occurs in:

    • 43% of sequestrated discs

    • 15% of extruded discs

(Reference 3)

This timeline is important when discussing surgical decisions.

If symptoms are tolerable and neurologically stable, the body often has time to adapt and improve.

One-Year Prognosis: What Can Patients Expect?

The clinical outlook is generally favorable — even if imaging still shows a herniation.

At 3 months:

  • Approximately 87% of patients treated conservatively report decreased pain
    (Reference 6)

At 1 year:

  • Up to 76% of herniated discs partially or completely resolve on MRI
    (Reference 6)

Motor recovery:

  • 81% of patients with initial muscle weakness recover without surgery by 1 year

  • Sensory deficits are more persistent, with about 50% recovery at 1 year
    (Reference 6)

This tells us something critical:

Improvement in symptoms does not require complete MRI resolution.

MRI Findings vs. Clinical Outcomes

One of the most important studies in this space showed:

At 1 year:

  • 85% of patients with persistent disc herniation on MRI reported favorable outcomes

  • 83% of patients with no visible herniation reported favorable outcomes

(Reference 8)

In other words:

Persistent imaging findings do not predict poor outcomes.

This dissociation between imaging and symptoms underscores why treatment decisions must prioritize:

  • Pain severity

  • Functional ability

  • Neurological status

  • Quality of life

—not imaging alone.

Recurrence Rates: What Happens Long-Term?

Even when symptoms improve, recurrence is possible.

  • Approximately 25% of patients whose sciatica resolves experience recurrence within 1 year
    (Reference 6)

For surgical patients:

  • 15–25% report recurrent low back pain 2 years after discectomy
    (Reference 7)

Surgery is not a guaranteed permanent fix — and conservative care is not a passive approach.

Both require long-term strategy.

Conservative vs. Surgical Management

The evidence consistently shows that:

  • Short-term pain relief may be faster with surgery in severe cases

  • Long-term functional outcomes are often similar between surgical and conservative care

The key is proper triage.

Surgery is typically considered when there is:

  • Progressive motor weakness

  • Severe, intractable pain

  • Cauda equina syndrome

  • Failure of structured conservative care

For most patients without red flags, conservative care is both safe and effective.

How We Approach Disc Herniation at Central Ohio Spine and Joint

We do not treat MRIs.

We treat people.

Our framework follows our proven system:

Repair → Retrain → Reinforce

Step 1: Repair

  • Reduce inflammation and nerve irritation

  • Improve spinal mobility

  • Calm acute pain

Step 2: Retrain

  • Restore proper movement patterns

  • Improve core control and spinal stability

  • Correct asymmetries

Step 3: Reinforce

  • Build long-term strength and tissue resilience

  • Progressive strength training

  • Structured return to activity

This approach aligns with the natural healing timeline of disc reabsorption.

When Should You Be Concerned?

Seek immediate evaluation if you experience:

  • Progressive leg weakness

  • Loss of bowel or bladder control

  • Severe unrelenting pain

  • Significant neurological changes

Otherwise, most disc herniations improve with structured care.

Key Takeaways

  • Two-thirds of disc herniations show spontaneous resorption.

  • Sequestrated and extruded discs are most likely to shrink.

  • Most patients improve clinically within 3 months.

  • MRI findings at 1 year do not predict outcomes.

  • Treatment decisions should be based on symptoms and function — not imaging alone.

If You’re in Westerville or Central Ohio

If you’ve recently been diagnosed with a disc herniation and are unsure whether surgery is necessary, we can help you understand:

  • Your specific herniation type

  • Your neurological status

  • Your functional limitations

  • Your realistic recovery timeline

At Central Ohio Spine and Joint, we provide structured conservative care designed to move you from pain to performance safely.

👉 Schedule a consultation here

References:

1.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Predictive Factors for Spontaneous Regression in Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine. 2023. Rashed S, Vassiliou A, Starup-Hansen J, Tsang K.
2.

Incidence of Spontaneous Resorption of Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Meta-Analysis.

Pain Physician. 2017. Zhong M, Liu JT, Jiang H, et al.
3.

The Probability of Spontaneous Regression of Lumbar Herniated Disc: A Systematic Review.

Clinical Rehabilitation. 2015. Chiu CC, Chuang TY, Chang KH, et al.
4.

Prediction of Lumbar Disc Herniation Resorption in Symptomatic Patients: A Prospective, Multi-Imaging and Clinical Phenotype Study.

The Spine Journal : Official Journal of the North American Spine Society. 2023. Hornung AL, Barajas JN, Rudisill SS, et al.
5.

6.

Herniated Lumbar Intervertebral Disk.

The New England Journal of Medicine. 2016. Deyo RA, Mirza SK.
7.

Incidence of Low Back Pain After Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Disc and Its Effect on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2015. Parker SL, Mendenhall SK, Godil SS, et al.
8.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Follow-up Assessment of Sciatica.

The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013. el Barzouhi A, Vleggeert-Lankamp CL, Lycklama à Nijeholt GJ, et al.